ardent

New pack?



Karmen


age
gender
gems
155
size
build
posts
63
player
10-04-2013, 11:11 AM (This post was last modified: 10-04-2013, 11:12 AM by Karmen.)
I'm not really sure if this is an issue of rogues or what but ~

I do not think we need another pack. It seems super pointless and will be redundant if that is how you solve the issue of rouges.

If the issue is too many rogues, you ban them. Simple as that.
OR
Expand the claiming power of tier I and II wolves. Just because a character does not "fit" in any of the packs is not an excuse to make another pack to cater to their needs. Expand tier I's and II's power to a few territories, not just the battlelands. Besides, that should be incentive to create icc drama. Characters should be limber, flexible to plot changes because that's just life - you can't control what job hires you or whether or not you'll be accepted into the college of your dreams HELL your parents might ship you off to a same-sex boarding school. It would suck, but that's just life.

It's bad enough that I don't see pack activity like it should be. Where are the organized hunts? Or medic training? I feel like ALL packs should do more PO posts and really focus on icc tasks and whatnot, because - personally - it feels super scattered. The war between Valhalla and Glaciem is literally the only think I can think of that involves the whole pack as a unit and really gets everybody involved. I think we neglect the pack territories we already have established, and creating a new pack is just not that answer.

Oh, and I think bands are too complicated. Rogues can travel together, but you really don't need a title on it.