Discussion about Judging
03-10-2013, 02:33 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-10-2013, 02:34 PM by Medusa i.)
xDDD
for the damage I was referring to "The winner of the fight must always be the one who dealt the most damage and received the least amount" from the first proposed judging template c:
and yeah i gotcha <3 lmao I honestly haven't read every post in this thread so sorry if I was a bit redundant, I was just highlighting a few things I'd seen. And maybe, if you get rid of full dodges, counters could make up for that c: I personally like counters vs. a full dodge, because I think they're more realistic, but I still like the idea of a full dodge because it allows the second poster to make up for the damage advantage that a first-poster gets.
WAIT IDEA LOL.
maybe the first poster, in exchange for getting full injury points in that first post, doesn't get a full dodge, but the second poster does?
for the damage I was referring to "The winner of the fight must always be the one who dealt the most damage and received the least amount" from the first proposed judging template c:
and yeah i gotcha <3 lmao I honestly haven't read every post in this thread so sorry if I was a bit redundant, I was just highlighting a few things I'd seen. And maybe, if you get rid of full dodges, counters could make up for that c: I personally like counters vs. a full dodge, because I think they're more realistic, but I still like the idea of a full dodge because it allows the second poster to make up for the damage advantage that a first-poster gets.
WAIT IDEA LOL.
maybe the first poster, in exchange for getting full injury points in that first post, doesn't get a full dodge, but the second poster does?
Current time: 11-21-2024, 06:55 PM
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.
